ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
When Archie Comics came under fire for including a gay wedding in a recent issue, the creators had an important decision to make: Who did they want their audience to be? The people who supported them for so many decades, or the hatepigs who never even read the comic in the first place?
They stood their ground. Archie's gay friend got married to the man of his dreams, that issue sold out in record time, "Kevin Keller" got his own spinoff comic and Archie Comics made a lot of money. It wasn't just the moral high ground, it was the financially sound option to take. Everybody wins, except for angry mothers whose parents failed them.
It's been about a month now, and I still keep thinking about the Derpy Hooves incident. And I keep coming back to how Archie Comics handled controversy so well, and how Hasbro handled it so terribly. I know you're tired of hearing this. I'm sure everyone who was hurt by it just wants to put it behind them. I just can't wrap my head around how so many good people would act so carelessly.
Hasbro and The Hub had an important choice to make too: Does Derpy Hooves represent the handicapped? Fans said she did not. Angry e-mails said she did.
By siding with the handful of complainers, they decided that YES, she does represent the handicapped. By changing her, and removing the aspects that could reasonably paint her as differently-abled, they decided that disabled people aren't welcome. They're not good enough to be in this show about loving and accepting everyone. They are a problem that needs to be corrected before they can join society, apparently.
It's not the changes themselves that are able-ist. That's not the part that upsets me. It was the fact that they thought she needed to be changed!
And these were the "good guys"! These were the folks who understood the internet, and who didn't put up a wall between themselves and their audience. When an unexpected demographic joined the fanbase, they welcomed "bronies" with open arms. Even when some of them took it too far. It makes me think that they took advantage of our trust.
What exactly was the problem? She had crossed-eyes and a silly voice. Those two things make a person representative of kids with disabilities? And by removing those two attributes, does that mean she's "normal"?
Something a friend of mine brought up in the comments: In a later episode when there was a pony portrayed as "barking mad", who was quickly told to get back to the hospital, out of public sight. Did people raise as big a stink over that? I'd say that's undermining the complexity of mental illness.
Portraying people with disabilities as wild animals is okay, but if we treat them like human beings, THAT'S going too far?
What lesson does this teach the kids watching at home? That prejudice is okay against cripples? Remember, they agreed with the whiners and decided she represents the handicapped. That's canon. So by removing what makes her different, they're saying that people who are different in that way aren't allowed to join in on the fun. They actively eliminated the only disabled character on their show, BECAUSE they thought she was disabled.
None of the fans were consulted about this. They didn't take questions, they didn't look to other viewpoints. They just panicked and made a decision that could only have been made out of ignorance or fear. They let everyone down.
Think about what this says: What about all of that "love and tolerate" stuff? What, is everyone welcome except the one who's different? This doesn't protect disabled kids, or kids with developmental disorders. It betrays the fans who stood by Hasbro and The Hub, and made this show such a success. It doesn't even protect Hasbro's interests, or its bottom line!
Everybody loses, except for angry mothers whose parents failed them.
And the worst part is? There's no going back from this. There is nothing they can do to fix this, no act of goodwill on the part of PR teams that can salvage this mess. They had such a good thing going, and all they had to do was not tell the world how much they wish spastics didn't exist in their perfect society. There's no way for me to watch this show without feeling like I'm supporting something sinister.
These people, who claim to be good, hard-working individuals who respect others? They crumbled at the first sign of controversy, and then offered the handicapped as a sacrifice. Jason Thiessen and his staff and crew, and his superiors and everyone involved left us high and dry.
I haven't watched the show since. I would have gladly considered myself a brony indefinitely, even with the unfortunate stigma of being associated with a few perverts. I never felt shame in that title until this happened. I wish I could go back. I wish I could still watch a delightful show and not feel guilt-ridden. But Bronies are good enough people that they can push past this. I am far too petty and vengeful. I cannot get over how badly this situation was handled.
All of the art in this journal was done by yours truly. It's because I appreciated and respected this program! All I expected of MLP's staff and crew was for them to be open and welcoming, and to not let mouth-breathers dictate their business strategy. If people complained about the portrayal of one of their characters, and those complaints were unfounded(they were!), I would have had the show's creator's backs on this one. We would have absolutely showed our support with our wallets, the way Kevin Keller became a financial incentive for Archie Comics.
But somebody involved in this show's production didn't leave us any ground to stand on. No, apparently all of the fans are worth less than some hate-fueled land monsters.
Derpy was a bridge between artists and their audience. By throwing away their fans so easily, they burned that bridge down.
Is this Jason Thiessen's fault? Was it the CEO of Discovery Communications, who owns The Hub? Was it Hasbro's choice? Was it a group decision, or did one person cast the winning vote? I have no idea. If so, who made this call? Who decided a bunch of bigots were more valuable than loving, paying customers? I don't know. I can't see over the wall.
All I know is that somebody killed the magic.
END OF LINE
~A.H.
Free Palestine
DeviantArt being pro-genocide is... you know what, I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
Bersnork
I've been writing fan-fiction of the game "Monster Prom" for about a year now. It's been my quarantine project. Something to maintain my sanity. I've been burned-out on it for a couple of months though. Same thing happened to me with Technicolor OCT: I reached a point that felt insurmountable and it was so demoralizing. And then I play video games and sulk about it. My Dad died on November 27, 2020. Then it was a couple of months of toothache so painful I needed advil for breakfast, lunch and dinner until I could get a tooth yanked out. I was seriously worried that I would never wake up from the anesthetic. I tried to write just enough that people could have an ending just in case I didn't make it. I didn't want to end up like that Berserk guy. 30 years working on something and he never bothered to write that shit down somewhere. Not even a quick post-it note summary. I'm 35 years old. My Dad made it to 70. If I live as long as he did, then that means I'm middle-aged. My brain sees
Technicolor OCT: Teh Edn
#TechnicolorOCT (https://www.deviantart.com/technicoloroct)
Here's how I would have ended it:
The thing with Trucube pointing a gun at the other toon cliffhanger? He would have aimed the gun at Battsy instead.
He'd pull the trigger and... water would come out. She'd get soaked, and then realizing it's not bullets, the stream would lessen and weaken and soften like a dying erection once Trucube stopped squeezing the trigger. The idea is that Battsy just needed to see if one of them would pull the trigger at all, so that they wouldn't hesitate when it came time to assassinate the Mayor later. With an actual gun. She was actually going to let them both live, it was just a test.
B
rust
Failing to finish the technicolor oct stuff I was trying after the tourney ended is an enormous failure on my part. At the same time, I can't control when everything I draw is so bad that it frustrates and discourages me from drawing for weeks or months at a time.
I wonder if I should just write up a summary of how I would have ended it. It's years after anyone noticed or cared anymore.
I mean, nobody is on deviantart anymore either.
who the hell am I even talking to anymore?
why is this important enough for me to feel bad about it but not enough to be able to do it right??
© 2012 - 2024 Phantosanucca
Comments5
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
This is amazingly written.